没有:和解

The s😔😷😐🙂ubt itl😆🤑😆`e of Jean-_😌🤢🤭😀Marie 😜🙂😂Str. \aub and Da^😐nièle 🤥🤭]
Huillet’s. *😋🤔🤔first😘🤒🤔😉 f🤪,🤥🤩🤨eatu🥰🤪🤮re,🤕😗 fr😄om 1965, “🤑😃😐On)😅🤭🤔ly Vio😚😒😐🤩len😌ce 🤕😀🤐😚😄Helps_😗=😑😍 Where 🤣🤮😪🤑Violence Reigns,🤢🤑🤑” sugges😀😀🤢ts the😗🤭😅 fierce politica🙂😀l program😁🤢 🙃🤕 evoked 😏[😌😶by their rigo#+ro🤣😀us 😜😛 a🤢esthetic. T🤐😙.he pretext of the f=😷🙂🤨ilm, set in C[ologne, i*🤮s Heinr*😶😚😃ich =%Böll😶)’s novel “Bill😝ia🤫🤨rds at Ha😁]lf Past🤕😆🤮😶 Ni?_ne,” which th:😍(ey_😑😃=🙃 strip dow😗 n to😐😴😄 😊🤪a🤫🤗\ handfu🤐*😋😒🤒l o🤮🙃f 🤥🙄stark e😍😗😘😑🤭ve😊😴😄nts😊😘 and fi😜😄😊lm with a c😄🤔🤪)onfrontational angular😪😌😑😬😏it+😏y akin 🤔😏😀🤐to !Bartó😃k’s mu😴 😝sic that 😊adorns the s=🤤oundtr🙂[😁😁ack. The sub#tlest of c 😏😷ues a🤔ccompany th🤣^`e 😘🤨+🥰story’`🤗s😋 comple🤨😁!x flashbacks. The m@iddle-ag😘😇😝ed Rob😆🤩🥰er😔😚😅😍t Fä/🤢hmel tell😌\#s 🤣🙂😃#a😄😁? y`😊😍oung hotel )bellhop😅( of 😛:\] perse!😋😍😪cutions under the Third Reich; hi🤑😍🤔s elderly🙄// father, He😘😙?inri🥰🤮ch, an arch😛😐🤤it😐😜🤕ect f😚]🤗a(
🤢med fo😛_]r 🤐😚a ;🤮🤤🤗local abb 🤔🤣🤒ey,😏-😆 recal😷;ls🙂🤫😒 the😝 militarism of t😙🤪he Firs😋`t World War, %;🤑when hi:🤥s wife, Joh😚(\anna, incu🤮🤤😴🤣%rred 😛`t#$rouble for🤥:. insul😷🤗😉🤭tin 🤐🙃g the🙂 Kaiser. A +😬😊third-😄g,😐#e😃neration^) Fä😃hmel is cons😆 id😑🥰eri) ng archit🙃+ecture,😘 🤤ju `st as t,🤕`😂he e😇xile😜😜d brot😬her of Robert’😆 🤤/s late $?wi😒😬🤐🤑fe, r 🙄😄eturn😪[s, only to be met by thei+ 😉r former tor(🤮🤨turer, now a$\(🤭🤢 W?:est G/(erman 😆🤑😐^official ta🤨$😪king part, in a=\ c😋🤐el🤫ebratory parade 🤐🤤😜of🤭:😔\🤐 war vet😆%erans.;🤗🤔 Straub )=and H🤭?😏😃😆u😃illet mak?😝[e)😘 🤭 the layers 🙂/of h 😂istor🤮y live🤨. in🤭🥰# 🤢th#😁🙄e pr🤪😁😐]
esen🤪🤑*t tense =, whic😃😋🤥🙄h they judge severely. The 😇 :($tamp😴%ed-dow@😜😑😚n 😛🤩🤔.a😊!cting and🤨*😅 🤔🤨the sp😌🤔are ?, tens\*😃e 🙃🤒vis.ua🤤😗😘l rh$🥰etor🤥😘ic suggest 🤔🤐a🙄🤤 state o🤗-f moral😷🤢 crisis a%😊😊s 🤩wel$😗l as the res😄🤐?^po#😚+😐nse—as much in style as i🤑[n substa🤔^nce—that it demands.